5ft 10 = £6.99
Also this weekend for the first time I sampled a chinese buffet king. Magic. All you can eat? ALL you can eat? didn’t believe it. Had desert and everything. Was a friday night and I’d had a few pints. Had to go home after 9 as I couldn’t move. Anyway to the point. Whilst checking the menu and various prices I spotted this. A Childs set menu, but not by age…oh no no. By Height…hilarious. At what point did they introduce this measure of taxness? How many people have argued their case and had to whip a tape measure out? Thought I might have to pay some form of tall tax. Thinking about it now it was full of really small old chinese people…like some really strange smelling bingo hall.
Tags: buffet, China Buffet King, chinese, food
March 18th, 2008 at 12:24 am
When trying to get on rides, the smaller children would use their age as a reason to be allowed on.
They clearly saw age to be more important than height, here, we have another perspective.
I need an equation to explain this, Macca, do the honours.
March 18th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
CT WOULD BE OK THEN WOULD HE??
March 18th, 2008 at 3:37 pm
Being rather tall, does that mean I have to pay more as well?
This is slightly unfair I think, should there not be a roundness ratio as well? Like, I’m tall, but there’s not a lot of me so surely I shouldn’t have to pay as much as a tall, rugby type?
March 19th, 2008 at 12:51 am
I don’t know, as far as roundness ratio’s go … no offence, but it’s typically the Skinny types that can eat and eat and eat … You could probably eat me under the table and Im a fat b@stard